cve/2016/CVE-2016-10728.md

### [CVE-2016-10728](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-10728)
![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Product&message=n%2Fa&color=blue)
![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Version&message=n%2Fa&color=blue)
![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Vulnerability&message=n%2Fa&color=brighgreen)

### Description

An issue was discovered in Suricata before 3.1.2. If an ICMPv4 error packet is received as the first packet on a flow in the to_client direction, it confuses the rule grouping lookup logic. The toclient inspection will then continue with the wrong rule group. This can lead to missed detection.

### POC

#### Reference
- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypass

#### Github
- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypass
Update Sun May 26 14:27:04 CEST 2024 2024-05-26 14:27:05 +02:00			`### [CVE-2016-10728](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-10728)`
			`![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Product&message=n%2Fa&color=blue)`
			`![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Version&message=n%2Fa&color=blue)`
			`![](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=Vulnerability&message=n%2Fa&color=brighgreen)`

			`### Description`

			`An issue was discovered in Suricata before 3.1.2. If an ICMPv4 error packet is received as the first packet on a flow in the to_client direction, it confuses the rule grouping lookup logic. The toclient inspection will then continue with the wrong rule group. This can lead to missed detection.`

			`### POC`

			`#### Reference`
			`- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypass`

			`#### Github`
Update CVE sources 2024-06-22 09:37 2024-06-22 09:37:59 +00:00			`- https://github.com/kirillwow/ids_bypass`
Update Sun May 26 14:27:04 CEST 2024 2024-05-26 14:27:05 +02:00