KEV reached the site three days ago but nothing in the markdown said a
vulnerability was under active attack, and the repository is what most
people actually read. 1,595 entries now carry a red CISA KEV shield beside
their product and vulnerability badges, marked for ransomware use where
CISA records it.
update_cves writes the badge on entries it creates, and the weekly audit
reconciles the whole set against the refreshed catalogue, so an entry CISA
adds gains the badge and one it withdraws loses it. Re-running the sync is
a no-op.
Every colour is now a Primer dark_default token. The header band, its four
capability pills and the heading above the trending table are gone, so the
search field is the first thing on the page and the switcher labels its own
table. Rows tighten to 10px, descriptions clamp to two lines, and the PoC
list loses its box for a hairline rule.
Blue is the only thing you can click. Amber means 500 stars or more and red
means known-exploited, and nothing else carries a hue: the star glyph is
dimmed at every value so the column reads as numbers rather than symbols.
The handoff's placeholder wanted an em dash. It reads "Search CVE, vendor,
product or keyword, exclude with -windows" with the middot the count line
already uses, and the six em dashes I had left in code comments are gone
too.
The first full pass over all 60,039 reference URLs: 1,566 answer 404 or
410, which removes 2,663 links from 2,419 entries and 2,445 lines from
references.txt. Anything that timed out, refused a HEAD or answered 403
kept its link.
The weekly job takes it from here on a five-week cycle, so this only had to
be paid once.
A timeout kept the link either way, but the checker still followed a failed
HEAD with a GET to the same dead host, so every unreachable URL cost two
full timeouts. Return on the first network failure and drop the timeout to
eight seconds: a measured 1,500 references went from roughly three URLs a
second to fifteen.
That pass removed 98 links across 86 inventory lines, and the weekly budget
rises to 12,000 references, which sweeps the corpus every five weeks.
The audit only ever asked GitHub about repositories, leaving 60,112
reference URLs unchecked since the corpus was inherited. Sampling put hard
404s at 4%, and one host accounts for a fifth of that on its own: CIS
retired the OVAL Repository, so all 942 links to it are permanently gone
and are removed in the next commit.
The rest is diffuse, so it needs sweeping rather than a rule. Check an
eighth of the URLs each week alongside the repositories, ordered
round-robin by host so a slice does not arrive at one server as a burst.
Only a 404 or 410 removes a link: a timeout, a refused HEAD or a 403 keeps
it, and update_cves already applies the same test to references it
discovers, so this holds inherited links to the standard new ones meet.
An advisory copied from a GitHub Security Advisory opens with "### Impact"
or "### Summary". The section parser treated any heading as a boundary, so
those descriptions ended themselves and reached the site empty. Only the
four headings an entry actually uses end a section now, and leading heading
markers are stripped when the text is rendered.
A trailing slash made exploit-db.com/exploits/41034 and .../41034/ two
different links, which put 53 duplicate rows in front of readers.
github.com also serves attachments and advisories, and 103 of those were
being parsed as owner/repo -- rendering "user-attachments / files" with an
empty star column instead of the PoC archive they point to.
CISA publishes a catalogue of vulnerabilities observed being exploited in
the wild, and 1,111 of its 1,685 entries are CVEs this index already holds
PoCs for. That is the one fact a reader most wants before opening an
exploit, and it was nowhere on the page.
The weekly audit stores the catalogue, the build trims it to the CVEs the
index carries, and a result row shows a KEV chip -- with the ransomware
flag where CISA records one, which covers 352 of them. 37 KB served.
A failed fetch keeps the stored catalogue rather than dropping the badge
off every entry. The chip reuses the header pill's treatment: the palette
still spends green on things you can click and amber on star counts only.
The PoC vocabulary was English-only, so a repository describing itself as
"漏洞利用" — an exploit — read as evidence that it was not one. Chinese is
the second language of this corpus by a wide margin, and the same gap
covered Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian, Japanese and Korean.
NON_POC_RE also vetoed "prueba", which is the proof in "prueba de
concepto", inverting the signal for Spanish repositories entirely.
On the 600-repository discovery sample this admits two more genuine PoCs
and nothing else.
The audit already asks GitHub about every linked repository, so the same
query can carry back a star count and a last-push date for free. Results go
to repo_meta.json, which lets a search result say which of two hundred
linked PoCs is worth opening.
2.1 MB for 45,008 repositories, refreshed weekly.
The trending table sorted and displayed updated_at, which also moves when a
repository merely gains a star, so a four-month-old exploit was claiming it
had been updated three hours ago. Record pushed_at and created_at and let
the page decide: last commit for the age it shows, repository age for the
trending rank.
The job now writes trending.json alongside the README table, so the site
reads the data instead of regex-parsing markdown the same job generated.
Ten modules totalling 2,206 lines, reachable from no workflow and no live
script, alongside 18 MB of github-all.txt and references-all.txt that
nothing reads and 400 KB of stale api/v1 output that shipped in every
Pages artifact. scripts/README.md documented this as the build process.
utils.py existed for one caller and duplicated functions build_site.py
already had, so it folds into it. Nothing imports a third-party package
any more, and requirements.txt goes with it.
Sampling the corpus put 17% of the repositories it links to behind a 404,
so readers were following links to repositories that no longer exist. The
previous audit script was 630 lines, never wired to anything, and kept its
state under a gitignored directory.
Replace it with a check that batches repository lookups through GraphQL
and removes a link only when GitHub answers NOT_FOUND for it, so a
throttle or a network error can never drop one. A quarter of the corpus
runs each week, which stays inside the token's hourly budget and sweeps
everything within the month.
A README caption in maniakh/CVE-2026-31431---Copy-Fail-PoC reads
"Copy Fail (CVE-2026-3143)", one digit short. That still parses as a
valid identifier, and the guard meant to catch it was satisfied by the
repo's generic exploit.py, so the PoC was filed against an unrelated
WordPress advisory. CVE-2026-8222 (Open5GS) collected a GiveWP lab the
same way. Drop an id from the same year that a longer mentioned id
extends, unless the repository name deliberately carries both.
Underscores are word characters, so the id regex matched neither half of
a name like CVE-2022-4174_CVE-2022-41742; read the separator-normalised
name too. Over 600 live candidates that recovers two real PoCs the gap
was hiding, Keycloak_CVE-2026-18963_PoC and CVE-2026-42945_NginxRift.
Pages builds from the workflow artifact, so the committed CVE_list.json
was never served while adding a fresh 53 MB blob to history every day.
Generate it during the Pages build instead and drop the duplicate
generator; scripts/build_site.py is now the only thing that writes it.
The jinja2 templates re-rendered a trending table that logic.js replaces
on load, so the page shell goes back to being a plain static file and the
Pages build no longer installs anything. Shallow-clone the sync job too:
it never reads git history, and the three-day lookback already recovers
a skipped day.
A repository dedicated to one CVE that calls itself a PoC and ships code
was still vetoed when its description happened to contain a generic word
like writeup, patched or detector. Check the description alongside the
name for PoC intent; pure scanners that never claim to be a PoC stay out.
Measured on 600 live candidates: 15 repositories gained, none lost.
Fall back to n/a for missing versions, matching the product and
vulnerability badges instead of rendering an empty shields.io chip.