From 3524e7bb0dc303762ae370e537fa5e2f7718f7b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: CVE Team Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:03:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] - Synchronized data. --- 2017/11xxx/CVE-2017-11508.json | 2 +- 2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3735.json | 3 +++ 2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3736.json | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/2017/11xxx/CVE-2017-11508.json b/2017/11xxx/CVE-2017-11508.json index d373f5b85d9..8de0fe68a7b 100644 --- a/2017/11xxx/CVE-2017-11508.json +++ b/2017/11xxx/CVE-2017-11508.json @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ "description_data" : [ { "lang" : "eng", - "value" : "SecurityCenter versions 5.5.0, 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 contain a SQL Injection vulnerability that could be exploited by an authenticated user with sufficient privileges to run diagnostic scans. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by entering a crafted SQL query into the password field of a diagnostic scan within SecurityCenter. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access" + "value" : "SecurityCenter versions 5.5.0, 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 contain a SQL Injection vulnerability that could be exploited by an authenticated user with sufficient privileges to run diagnostic scans. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by entering a crafted SQL query into the password field of a diagnostic scan within SecurityCenter. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access." } ] }, diff --git a/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3735.json b/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3735.json index abc735627c0..c56cd0a33b3 100644 --- a/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3735.json +++ b/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3735.json @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ { "url" : "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170828.txt" }, + { + "url" : "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171102.txt" + }, { "url" : "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100515" } diff --git a/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3736.json b/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3736.json index 5cff7fc2b2c..8aff084ffdd 100644 --- a/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3736.json +++ b/2017/3xxx/CVE-2017-3736.json @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ "description_data" : [ { "lang" : "eng", - "value" : "There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen." + "value" : "There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen." } ] },