admin/cvelist
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist.git synced 2025-06-08 05:58:08 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update the entry for CVE-2019-1551

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Matt Caswell 2020-03-17 17:53:42 +00:00
parent 590a586d42
commit cc7527c5a4
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: D9C4D26D0E604491
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
2019/1xxx/CVE-2019-1551.json
View File

@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e-dev (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d)"
},
"version_value": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d)"
},
{
"version_value": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)"
"version_value": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)"
}
]
}
@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e-dev (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)."
"lang": "eng",
"value": "There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t)."
}
]
},