{
    "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2010-3192",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
    },
    "affects": {
        "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
                {
                    "product": {
                        "product_data": [
                            {
                                "product_name": "n/a",
                                "version": {
                                    "version_data": [
                                        {
                                            "version_value": "n/a"
                                        }
                                    ]
                                }
                            }
                        ]
                    },
                    "vendor_name": "n/a"
                }
            ]
        }
    },
    "data_format": "MITRE",
    "data_type": "CVE",
    "data_version": "4.0",
    "description": {
        "description_data": [
            {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
            }
        ]
    },
    "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
            {
                "description": [
                    {
                        "lang": "eng",
                        "value": "n/a"
                    }
                ]
            }
        ]
    },
    "references": {
        "reference_data": [
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5"
            },
            {
                "name": "20100427 Fun with FORTIFY_SOURCE",
                "refsource": "FULLDISC",
                "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100902 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100831 Re: CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6"
            },
            {
                "name": "[oss-security] 20100825 CVE id request: libc fortify source information disclosure",
                "refsource": "MLIST",
                "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8"
            }
        ]
    }
}