{ "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2009-0698", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Integer overflow in the 4xm demuxer (demuxers/demux_4xm.c) in xine-lib 1.1.16.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a 4X movie file with a large current_track value, a similar issue to CVE-2009-0385." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "USN-746-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-746-1" }, { "name": "MDVSA-2009:299", "refsource": "MANDRIVA", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:299" }, { "name": "xinelib-4xmdemuxer-code-execution(48954)", "refsource": "XF", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48954" }, { "name": "http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=660071", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=660071" }, { "name": "http://bugs.xine-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://bugs.xine-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205" }, { "name": "MDVSA-2009:298", "refsource": "MANDRIVA", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:298" }, { "name": "SUSE-SR:2009:009", "refsource": "SUSE", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html" }, { "name": "http://www.trapkit.de/advisories/TKADV2009-004.txt", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.trapkit.de/advisories/TKADV2009-004.txt" }, { "name": "20090128 [TKADV2009-004] FFmpeg Type Conversion Vulnerability", "refsource": "BUGTRAQ", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500514/100/0/threaded" } ] } }