mirror of
https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist.git
synced 2025-07-30 18:04:30 +00:00
b090504e1b
Apache CNA) and ensure that the product names are correct and consistent (which in most cases means adding "Apache", but some required more work). Make sure the vendor name is correct. Make sure affected versions matches the text somewhat, although we don't try to make every product write these in the same way, they're not supposed to be totally machine readable. Then make some fixes to the text as required where there are mistakes or inconsistencies or the Apache name isn't mentioned. There are 5 left untouched for now, one is known (where we assigned an issues to an incubator version which came out prior to being part of Apache), and four which need more work.
64 lines
2.7 KiB
JSON
64 lines
2.7 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"CVE_data_meta" : {
|
|
"ASSIGNER" : "security@apache.org",
|
|
"DATE_PUBLIC" : "2018-02-08T00:00:00",
|
|
"ID" : "CVE-2018-1298",
|
|
"STATE" : "PUBLIC"
|
|
},
|
|
"affects" : {
|
|
"vendor" : {
|
|
"vendor_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"product" : {
|
|
"product_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"product_name" : "Apache Qpid Broker-J",
|
|
"version" : {
|
|
"version_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"version_value" : "7.0.0"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"vendor_name" : "Apache Software Foundation"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"data_format" : "MITRE",
|
|
"data_type" : "CVE",
|
|
"data_version" : "4.0",
|
|
"description" : {
|
|
"description_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang" : "eng",
|
|
"value" : "A Denial of Service vulnerability was found in Apache Qpid Broker-J 7.0.0 in functionality for authentication of connections for AMQP protocols 0-8, 0-9, 0-91 and 0-10 when PLAIN or XOAUTH2 SASL mechanism is used. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker to crash the broker instance. AMQP 1.0 and HTTP connections are not affected. An authentication of incoming AMQP connections in Apache Qpid Broker-J is performed by special entities called \"Authentication Providers\". Each Authentication Provider can support several SASL mechanisms which are offered to the connecting clients as part of SASL negotiation process. The client chooses the most appropriate SASL mechanism for authentication. Authentication Providers of following types supports PLAIN SASL mechanism: Plain, PlainPasswordFile, SimpleLDAP, Base64MD5PasswordFile, MD5, SCRAM-SHA-256, SCRAM-SHA-1. XOAUTH2 SASL mechanism is supported by Authentication Providers of type OAuth2. If an AMQP port is configured with any of these Authentication Providers, the Broker may be vulnerable."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"problemtype" : {
|
|
"problemtype_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"description" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang" : "eng",
|
|
"value" : "Denial of Service Vulnerability"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"references" : {
|
|
"reference_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"name" : "[users] 20180208 [SECURITY][CVE-2018-1298] Apache Qpid Broker-J Denial of Service Vulnerability with PLAIN and XOAUTH2 SASL mechanisms",
|
|
"refsource" : "MLIST",
|
|
"url" : "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d9087e9e57c9b6376754e2b4ea8cd5e9ae6449ed17fc384640c9c9e1@%3Cusers.qpid.apache.org%3E"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|