mirror of
https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist.git
synced 2025-07-29 05:56:59 +00:00
77 lines
2.6 KiB
JSON
77 lines
2.6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"CVE_data_meta": {
|
|
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"ID": "CVE-2017-5999",
|
|
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
|
|
},
|
|
"affects": {
|
|
"vendor": {
|
|
"vendor_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"product": {
|
|
"product_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"product_name": "n/a",
|
|
"version": {
|
|
"version_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"version_value": "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"vendor_name": "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"data_format": "MITRE",
|
|
"data_type": "CVE",
|
|
"data_version": "4.0",
|
|
"description": {
|
|
"description_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "eng",
|
|
"value": "An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"problemtype": {
|
|
"problemtype_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"description": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "eng",
|
|
"value": "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"references": {
|
|
"reference_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2017020196",
|
|
"refsource": "MISC",
|
|
"url": "https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2017020196"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/commit/a0e2c485e53b370a7cc6d833e192c3c5bfd70e1f",
|
|
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/commit/a0e2c485e53b370a7cc6d833e192c3c5bfd70e1f"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "96562",
|
|
"refsource": "BID",
|
|
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96562"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/releases/tag/2.1.0.17022601",
|
|
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/releases/tag/2.1.0.17022601"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
} |