mirror of
https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist.git
synced 2025-07-29 05:56:59 +00:00
73 lines
3.2 KiB
JSON
73 lines
3.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"CVE_data_meta" : {
|
|
"ASSIGNER" : "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"ID" : "CVE-2016-9938",
|
|
"STATE" : "PUBLIC"
|
|
},
|
|
"affects" : {
|
|
"vendor" : {
|
|
"vendor_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"product" : {
|
|
"product_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"product_name" : "n/a",
|
|
"version" : {
|
|
"version_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"version_value" : "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"vendor_name" : "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"data_format" : "MITRE",
|
|
"data_type" : "CVE",
|
|
"data_version" : "4.0",
|
|
"description" : {
|
|
"description_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang" : "eng",
|
|
"value" : "An issue was discovered in Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.25.1, 13.x before 13.13.1, and 14.x before 14.2.1 and Certified Asterisk 11.x before 11.6-cert16 and 13.x before 13.8-cert4. The chan_sip channel driver has a liberal definition for whitespace when attempting to strip the content between a SIP header name and a colon character. Rather than following RFC 3261 and stripping only spaces and horizontal tabs, Asterisk treats any non-printable ASCII character as if it were whitespace. This means that headers such as Contact\\x01: will be seen as a valid Contact header. This mostly does not pose a problem until Asterisk is placed in tandem with an authenticating SIP proxy. In such a case, a crafty combination of valid and invalid To headers can cause a proxy to allow an INVITE request into Asterisk without authentication since it believes the request is an in-dialog request. However, because of the bug described above, the request will look like an out-of-dialog request to Asterisk. Asterisk will then process the request as a new call. The result is that Asterisk can process calls from unvetted sources without any authentication. If you do not use a proxy for authentication, then this issue does not affect you. If your proxy is dialog-aware (meaning that the proxy keeps track of what dialogs are currently valid), then this issue does not affect you. If you use chan_pjsip instead of chan_sip, then this issue does not affect you."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"problemtype" : {
|
|
"problemtype_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"description" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang" : "eng",
|
|
"value" : "n/a"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"references" : {
|
|
"reference_data" : [
|
|
{
|
|
"name" : "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2016-009.html",
|
|
"refsource" : "CONFIRM",
|
|
"url" : "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2016-009.html"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name" : "94789",
|
|
"refsource" : "BID",
|
|
"url" : "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94789"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name" : "1037408",
|
|
"refsource" : "SECTRACK",
|
|
"url" : "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037408"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|