cvelist/2012/1xxx/CVE-2012-1620.json
2019-03-18 02:31:43 +00:00

102 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON

{
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-1620",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20120405 Re: CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20120405 CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1"
},
{
"name": "48700",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700"
},
{
"name": "slock-xraisewindow-sec-bypass(74666)",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666"
},
{
"name": "81035",
"refsource": "OSVDB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035"
},
{
"name": "52922",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922"
},
{
"name": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310"
}
]
}
}