cvelist/2011/1xxx/CVE-2011-1775.json

{
   "CVE_data_meta" : {
      "ASSIGNER" : "cve@mitre.org",
      "ID" : "CVE-2011-1775",
      "STATE" : "PUBLIC"
   },
   "affects" : {
      "vendor" : {
         "vendor_data" : [
            {
               "product" : {
                  "product_data" : [
                     {
                        "product_name" : "n/a",
                        "version" : {
                           "version_data" : [
                              {
                                 "version_value" : "n/a"
                              }
                           ]
                        }
                     }
                  ]
               },
               "vendor_name" : "n/a"
            }
         ]
      }
   },
   "data_format" : "MITRE",
   "data_type" : "CVE",
   "data_version" : "4.0",
   "description" : {
      "description_data" : [
         {
            "lang" : "eng",
            "value" : "The CSecurityTLS::processMsg function in common/rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx in the vncviewer component in TigerVNC 1.1beta1 does not properly verify the server's X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a TLS VNC server via an arbitrary certificate."
         }
      ]
   },
   "problemtype" : {
      "problemtype_data" : [
         {
            "description" : [
               {
                  "lang" : "eng",
                  "value" : "n/a"
               }
            ]
         }
      ]
   },
   "references" : {
      "reference_data" : [
         {
            "name" : "[oss-security] 20110506 CVE request: tigervnc",
            "refsource" : "MLIST",
            "url" : "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/06/2"
         },
         {
            "name" : "[oss-security] 20110509 Re: CVE request: tigervnc",
            "refsource" : "MLIST",
            "url" : "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/09/7"
         },
         {
            "name" : "[tigervnc-devel] 20110504 Re: potential vulnerability in TLS secType?",
            "refsource" : "MLIST",
            "url" : "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01345.html"
         },
         {
            "name" : "[tigervnc-devel] 20110504 potential vulnerability in TLS secType?",
            "refsource" : "MLIST",
            "url" : "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01342.html"
         },
         {
            "name" : "[tigervnc-devel] 20110505 Re: potential vulnerability in TLS secType?",
            "refsource" : "MLIST",
            "url" : "http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01347.html"
         },
         {
            "name" : "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702470",
            "refsource" : "CONFIRM",
            "url" : "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702470"
         },
         {
            "name" : "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702672",
            "refsource" : "CONFIRM",
            "url" : "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702672"
         },
         {
            "name" : "FEDORA-2011-6838",
            "refsource" : "FEDORA",
            "url" : "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-May/060567.html"
         },
         {
            "name" : "RHSA-2011:0871",
            "refsource" : "REDHAT",
            "url" : "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0871.html"
         },
         {
            "name" : "47738",
            "refsource" : "BID",
            "url" : "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47738"
         },
         {
            "name" : "44939",
            "refsource" : "SECUNIA",
            "url" : "http://secunia.com/advisories/44939"
         }
      ]
   }
}