mirror of
https://github.com/fkie-cad/nvd-json-data-feeds.git
synced 2025-05-28 01:02:25 +00:00
45 lines
3.6 KiB
JSON
45 lines
3.6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"id": "CVE-2024-47679",
|
|
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
|
|
"published": "2024-10-21T12:15:04.920",
|
|
"lastModified": "2024-10-21T17:09:45.417",
|
|
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
|
|
"cveTags": [],
|
|
"descriptions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "en",
|
|
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvfs: fix race between evice_inodes() and find_inode()&iput()\n\nHi, all\n\nRecently I noticed a bug[1] in btrfs, after digged it into\nand I believe it'a race in vfs.\n\nLet's assume there's a inode (ie ino 261) with i_count 1 is\ncalled by iput(), and there's a concurrent thread calling\ngeneric_shutdown_super().\n\ncpu0: cpu1:\niput() // i_count is 1\n ->spin_lock(inode)\n ->dec i_count to 0\n ->iput_final() generic_shutdown_super()\n ->__inode_add_lru() ->evict_inodes()\n // cause some reason[2] ->if (atomic_read(inode->i_count)) continue;\n // return before // inode 261 passed the above check\n // list_lru_add_obj() // and then schedule out\n ->spin_unlock()\n// note here: the inode 261\n// was still at sb list and hash list,\n// and I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE was not been set\n\nbtrfs_iget()\n // after some function calls\n ->find_inode()\n // found the above inode 261\n ->spin_lock(inode)\n // check I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE\n // and passed\n ->__iget()\n ->spin_unlock(inode) // schedule back\n ->spin_lock(inode)\n // check (I_NEW|I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE) flags,\n // passed and set I_FREEING\niput() ->spin_unlock(inode)\n ->spin_lock(inode)\t\t\t ->evict()\n // dec i_count to 0\n ->iput_final()\n ->spin_unlock()\n ->evict()\n\nNow, we have two threads simultaneously evicting\nthe same inode, which may trigger the BUG(inode->i_state & I_CLEAR)\nstatement both within clear_inode() and iput().\n\nTo fix the bug, recheck the inode->i_count after holding i_lock.\nBecause in the most scenarios, the first check is valid, and\nthe overhead of spin_lock() can be reduced.\n\nIf there is any misunderstanding, please let me know, thanks.\n\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000eabe1d0619c48986@google.com/\n[2]: The reason might be 1. SB_ACTIVE was removed or 2. mapping_shrinkable()\nreturn false when I reproduced the bug."
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"metrics": {},
|
|
"references": [
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0eed942bc65de1f93eca7bda51344290f9c573bb",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f8a5b6d0dafa4f533ac82e98f8b812073a7c9d1",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3721a69403291e2514d13a7c3af50a006ea1153b",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47a68c75052a660e4c37de41e321582ec9496195",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/540fb13120c9eab3ef203f90c00c8e69f37449d1",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c857fb12b9137fee574443385d53914356bbe11",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b1afbf0f6b221f6c5bb66cc80cd3b38d696687",
|
|
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |