mirror of
https://github.com/fkie-cad/nvd-json-data-feeds.git
synced 2025-07-09 16:05:11 +00:00
125 lines
3.8 KiB
JSON
125 lines
3.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"id": "CVE-2015-1571",
|
|
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"published": "2015-02-10T20:59:06.263",
|
|
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
|
|
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
|
|
"cveTags": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"disputed"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"descriptions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "en",
|
|
"value": "The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says \"The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "es",
|
|
"value": "** DISPUTADA ** La implementaci\u00f3n del protocolo CAPWAP DTLS en Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 utiliza el mismo certificado y clave privada a trav\u00e9s de las distintas instalaciones de los clientes, lo que hace que sea m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores SSL aprovechando la clave privada y certificado Fortinet_Factory. NOTA: FG-IR-15-002 dice \"El certificado Fortinet_Factory es \u00fanico para cada dispositivo ... Un atacante no puede por tanto perpetrar un ataque MitM\"."
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"metrics": {
|
|
"cvssMetricV2": [
|
|
{
|
|
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
|
|
"type": "Primary",
|
|
"cvssData": {
|
|
"version": "2.0",
|
|
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
|
|
"baseScore": 4.3,
|
|
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
|
|
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"authentication": "NONE",
|
|
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
|
|
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
|
|
"availabilityImpact": "NONE"
|
|
},
|
|
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
|
|
"impactScore": 2.9,
|
|
"acInsufInfo": false,
|
|
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
|
|
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
|
|
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
|
|
"userInteractionRequired": true
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"weaknesses": [
|
|
{
|
|
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
|
|
"type": "Primary",
|
|
"description": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "en",
|
|
"value": "CWE-310"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"configurations": [
|
|
{
|
|
"nodes": [
|
|
{
|
|
"operator": "OR",
|
|
"negate": false,
|
|
"cpeMatch": [
|
|
{
|
|
"vulnerable": true,
|
|
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:5.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
|
|
"matchCriteriaId": "823C8357-E638-4EAE-B231-3B60263FFE52"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"references": [
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
|
|
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Exploit"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
|
|
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Vendor Advisory"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
|
|
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Exploit"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
|
|
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Exploit"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
|
|
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Vendor Advisory"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"url": "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
|
|
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"Exploit"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |