2024-07-21 02:03:14 +00:00

29 lines
2.9 KiB
JSON

{
"id": "CVE-2024-40917",
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"published": "2024-07-12T13:15:14.797",
"lastModified": "2024-07-12T16:34:58.687",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmemblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES\n\nOn an (old) x86 system with SRAT just covering space above 4Gb:\n\n ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff] hotplug\n\nthe commit referenced below leads to this NUMA configuration no longer\nbeing refused by a CONFIG_NUMA=y kernel (previously\n\n NUMA: nodes only cover 6144MB of your 8185MB e820 RAM. Not used.\n No NUMA configuration found\n Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff]\n\nwas seen in the log directly after the message quoted above), because of\nmemblock_validate_numa_coverage() checking for NUMA_NO_NODE (only). This\nin turn led to memblock_alloc_range_nid()'s warning about MAX_NUMNODES\ntriggering, followed by a NULL deref in memmap_init() when trying to\naccess node 64's (NODE_SHIFT=6) node data.\n\nTo compensate said change, make memblock_set_node() warn on and adjust\na passed in value of MAX_NUMNODES, just like various other functions\nalready do."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: memblock: make memblock_set_node() tambi\u00e9n advierte sobre el uso de MAX_NUMNODES En un sistema x86 (antiguo) con SRAT que solo cubre espacio superior a 4 Gb: ACPI: SRAT: Nodo 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000 -0xfffffffff] hotplug, El commit a la que se hace referencia a continuaci\u00f3n hace que esta configuraci\u00f3n NUMA ya no sea rechazada por un kernel CONFIG_NUMA=y (anteriormente NUMA: los nodos solo cubren 6144 MB de su RAM e820 de 8185 MB. No se usa. No se encontr\u00f3 ninguna configuraci\u00f3n NUMA Falsificar un nodo en [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff] se vio en el registro directamente despu\u00e9s del mensaje citado anteriormente), debido a que memblock_validate_numa_coverage() verifica NUMA_NO_NODE (solamente). Esto a su vez llev\u00f3 a la advertencia de memblock_alloc_range_nid() sobre la activaci\u00f3n de MAX_NUMNODES, seguida de una deref NULL en memmap_init() al intentar acceder a los datos del nodo 64 (NODE_SHIFT=6). Para compensar dicho cambio, active memblock_set_node() y ajuste un valor pasado de MAX_NUMNODES, tal como lo hacen otras funciones."
}
],
"metrics": {},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22f742b8f738918f683198a18ec3c691acda14c4",
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0eec24e2e199873f43df99ec39773ad3af2bff7",
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
]
}